This gallery contains 9 photos.
Published on Oct 13, 2018
Testimony by Dafna Tachover, International expert on health effects of electromagnetic radiation and questions from members of the House Energy Committee.
View original post 715 more words
Here are some client shirts which was Tailored as per the clients liking, my pictures are not the best but the client wanted to remove about 5 full inches from each shirt on the sides and the back. Upon actual application I was able to safely remove about 4.25 inches all together, he loved them.
Visit us at http://www.ztailor.com to schedule a fit appointment
View original post 217 more words
22. It is no mere “procedural nicety,” from a contractual point of view, to insist that only those with authority to foreclose on a borrower be permitted to do so. (Levitin, The Paper Chase: Securitization, Foreclosure, and the Uncertainty of Mortgage Title, supra, 63 Duke L.J. at p. 650.) “Such a view fundamentally misunderstands the mortgage contract. The mortgage contract is not simply an agreement that the home may be sold upon a default on the loan. Instead, it is an agreement that if the homeowner defaults on the loan, the mortgagee may sell the property pursuant to the requisite legal procedure.” (Ibid., italics added and omitted.)
The logic of defendants’ no-prejudice argument implies that anyone, even a stranger to the debt, could declare a default and order a trustee’s sale—and the borrower would be left with no recourse because, after all, he or she owed the debt to someone…
View original post 73 more words
It is alleged and based on the information contained at the link below city_of_miami_-_amended_comments_on_draft_environmental_impact_statement_nureg_2176_1.
The paper seems to suggest that FPL is up to no good again, dumping toxic waste in the drinking water of the people of Miami, the power plant is leeching poison into the fresh water and into the sea.
View original post 677 more words
Normally I go to the Normandy Branch in Miami Beach, but sometimes I go to the North Miami branch, there the workers are always rude, every time over many years. I tolerated that. The last time I went there I almost always get the same rude teller, she has managed to keep that job forever, while being rude. I have seen her rude to other people, however this morning I went there again.
I always go well dressed and today I wore my favourite sun glasses.
I was attempting to deposit a check to the account at the bank where I keep money.
The rude teller stuck a small sign in my face which said I must remove my sunglasses for security reasons, they know me there having gone there so many times, there is an armed man sitting in plain view of the computer screen where he is able to view the transactions of clients.
I could see the guard observing the transactions, from his convenient vantage point.
I refused to remove my sunglasses, the teller picked up the phone immediately, and another worker came over, bluntly informing me, if I “needed service I have to remove my sunglasses” I simply walked out of the bank never to return again for the rest of this life.
I so wanted to spit, but I held my composure. I hate being unkind.
Now I close that account.
I think it is important to ask BOA, if slapping their clients in their faces worked?
Sucky bank you are.
13490 NW 7th Ave, North Miami, FL 33168 branch address.
Popular, Inc., doing business as Banco Popular in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands and as Popular Community Bank in the United States, is a financial services conglomerate that has been operating in Puerto Rico for almost 120 years and in the United States for over 52 years. In recent years, it has expanded into other areas of the Caribbean and Central America. The BPPR in the logo stands for Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, where the bank has its major historical footprint.
Popular, Inc. is the parent company of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Banco Popular North America, E-Loan, and several other companies.
The headquarters of Banco Popular Puerto Rico are located in Hato Rey, Puerto Rico.
The Bank is sorta forgetting who it works for, the bank thinks it can slap all of the clients in the face and survive, again ask Bank of America how that worked?
Granted that this particular bank is in a rough part of the city but treating clients with contempt on a continual basis will never wash in the long haul.
Visit the Canada Party’s party headquarters – http://www.AmericaButBetter.com
Created and produced by Chris Cannon (cannonwriter.com) and Brian Calvert (brianMcalvert.com). Video graphics by Mark Woodman & Brendon Morfitt.
For the first time, the real reason atomic bombs were used is explained.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
KingCast, Mortgage Movies and Attorney Scott Stafne Discuss Banks’ Removal to Federal Court, Judicial Bias and the Unconstitutional Nature of the Washington Deed of Trust Act.
Down below is my flow chart with Washington Attorney Scott Stafne as we discussed a wide-ranging series of issues involving the apparently unconstitutional nature of the Washington Deed of Trust Act as well as the Bank’s flight response to Federal Court, where the Federal Court in Washington typically does not do Justice to the State Law. State Law was originally drafted to protect the individual against government and corporate excess and corruption. This is why Attorney Stafne correctly attempted to recuse Judge Marsha Pechman (the denial) who has never ruled in favor of a homeowner; always ruling in favor of the bank even going through heavy contortions to do so. Perhaps later I will upload Frias v. Asset Foreclosures Servs., Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106755 (2013) as cited by Attorney Stafne in his Motion. Suffice it to say it is painful to read.
This is why today we see Wells Fargo running to Federal Court on a Removal of a lawsuit Attorney Jeff Jared filed for Financial Revival Group Members Family E, as noted in this recent Mortgage Movies Journal entry and on my video page at the U.S. Independent. What happened was that in Mediation we presented a full REST report showing that the homeowner was NPV positive and should have provided a HAMP modification but did not, in similar fashion to Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (673 F.3d 547) and the 9th circuit case of Corvello v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 728 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. August 8, 2013), citing Wigod. We notified the Mediators about this case law and WF refused to provide all of their data and the full test so my request for the Bad Faith Certificate was granted; the second such Certificate issued to Wells Fargo in the past few months. Sad but true. Stay tuned for updates on those cases.
Here then is my loose outline for the interview, part one of three appearing above:
How can there ever be the sort of neutrality required by a Trustee/Beneficiary relationship when all of the major Trustees are owned by law firms who work for the banks?
We are here with Attorney Scott Stafne whose client John Knecht has pending questions for the Federal Court to Certify to the State Superior Court involving the apparently Unconstitutional Washington Deed of Trust Act. He is having a difficult time being heard.
Now Scott, first of all the Constitution at Article IV §6 specifically notes that Superior Courts will have jurisdiction over all issues involving title and possession of land, so how can the Washington DTA be constitutional? Further, other similar challenges involving the Labor Disputes Act were resolved in favor of the Constitutionality argument, such that the Superior Court retained Jurisdiction.
Furthermore as regards the Statute itself, your next argument is that Statutory Construction of the DTA was supposed to require that the foreclosing entity may ONLY be the “beneficiary and OWNER of the Note secured by the DoT”, in contrast we now have certain judges allowing the holder of the Note to foreclose and that is not consistent with the Statutory limitation put in place.
I can teach you how to sew. I can teach you how to make garments that you can wear, you will learn how to mend and repair your clothes, how to make patterns, how to use the sewing machines.